Profiles in Wingnuttery: The Browns
We've got another standoff between the feds and some wingnuts who are willing to become martyrs for a silly cause. This time the cause is the extremist libertarian belief that the government does not have a right to collect taxes. A dentist and her husband have built a survivalist compound out in the middle of nowhere New Hampshire and they're holed up with some wacko militia types and being visited by a Ruby Ridge survivor. PLAINFIELD, New Hampshire (AP) -- To avoid serving prison sentences for tax evasion, Ed Brown and his wife, Elaine, have locked themselves off from the world on their own terms.I have a very hard time feeling bad for these people who basically commit suicide by cop in these standoffs (I do feel horribly for the children hurt because the adults around them are idiots - but I put the blame 100% on the wingnuts who don't know when to give up). By the time there's a standoff, it's far beyond the point where the whole thing can be over with no consequences. At that point, you're either going to prison or dying. No matter how wrapped up in your cause you are, nobody of any importance is going to consider you a political prisoner and a victim of injustice. If anything, we people who work hard and pay our taxes to contribute to the functioning of our government are pissed off that the money we work so hard to make is being wasted right now on you spoiled little brats. And this sure is not going to be good publicity for the Free State Project! Do us all a favor and either surrender or start that hail of bullets that will be your end. Just do it soon. I don't want to have to keep reading about your continued stupidity every day. Labels: asshattery |






Comments on "Profiles in Wingnuttery: The Browns"
-
Bud said ... (6/21/07 2:23 PM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (6/21/07 4:16 PM) :
-
Jason said ... (6/21/07 6:48 PM) :
-
Anthony Lemons said ... (6/21/07 9:44 PM) :
-
Jason said ... (6/21/07 10:20 PM) :
-
Anthony Lemons said ... (6/21/07 11:42 PM) :
-
Jason said ... (6/22/07 6:48 AM) :
post a commentTaking Live Free Or Die to a new level. I don't read this crap any more than I'd get past a headline about Paris or Britney or any celebrity moron.
You make some great points, the government is always right. We should do whatever we they demand us to do. Anything else would be "nutty". Besides, a war against Iran isn't going to pay for itself.
Anonymous, don't be a moron.
I like your site, however, if a law does not exist, which no judge or government official has been able to point it out, how can it be enforced? I am by far, no Liberal, but I do believe that any law that is expected to be abided by, then that law needs to be an actual law. The only income tax law that exist, is in regards to foreign corporations, that do business in our country. I understand where these "tax evaders" are coming from, and I think they should have went another route, such as file a suit against the government, and see if in fact, the court can show such a law exist. If every American just did what the government said, like zombies, then we would all be Liberals by now, and I will never become one of them. Great site, and good luck in our battle.
Anthony, I'm no law scholar, but I agree with you about a right way and a wrong way of doing things. By all means they should have gone to court to challenge this law. They had a chance to go to court but instead were convicted in absentia. These people have no desire to use the proper means to make their point. Now they're in a lose-lose situation of their own making.
Now what on earth are you talking about liberals just following whatever the government says? Have you been living in a cave?
Jason, what I mean about all of us would be Liberals if the government had their way, is because Liberals may seem to seek Freedoms, but in order to achieve those freedoms, Liberals want all other points of view eliminated; Example, wanting the Fair Information Act re-enacted, the one Ronald Reagon did away with, the Act that required any radio and political talk show to have an opposite viewpoint on the show or one could be jailed or face job loss. Even station owners could lose their license under that Act, and that is government meddling with a free market.
So let me get this straight. Wanting to keep the media from only showing one viewpoint is trying to eliminate all other viewpoints? Or are you calling Reagan a liberal?
My understanding of the Fair Information act was that if a station was going to present a viewpoint, they were obliged to give equal time to the opposite viewpoint, but not necessarily on the same show. So for every hour of O'Reilly you'd have to have an hour of Olbermann. I don't have a problem with that. There is no such thing as a truly free market anyway. All markets have some sort of government control in order to keep those with more money from taking too much advantage of those without.
I can see that you're one of these libertarians. While I'm 100% there with you on the issue of civil liberties, but I just don't think that those liberties extend to business and economics in the context of a group of people living together in a civilized society. Yes, I'm one of those evil collectivists. If individualists don't want to participate in a society, I think there should be a place they could go to live as self sufficiently as they could without all the benefits of collectivism such as basic infastructure.
It's been my experience that any attempt to debate these points with libertarians is pointless as their belief in these so-called free markets is as fundamentalist as any evangelical's belief in the bible's literal truth. So I agree to disagree and recognize the futility of trying to change each others minds on this.